In my last article, I wrote about the modern company which effectively operates like a Shamrock. This means that core services are delivered by core associates in the main part of the company. The second leaf involves other services such as legal, tax, IT, even janitorial, waste management and several other services that are “outsourced” as contracts. The third leaf is the “just in time” segment of the operation where services are needed for special projects and may involve contracted staffing and outsourced recruiting or training.
For 2009 outside recruiting may take a back seat as some organizations “rightsize” to face economic pressures. Using outsourced recruiting can make economic sense. There are three major types of firms servicing the South Florida healthcare market. Retained firms still specialize in senior level positions. Fees are paid upfront, during the search and when the new hire starts. Contingency firms are very cost efficient in that fees are only paid upon the start of a new hire. Essentially, clients get free looks at talent, without up front costs. The third type of firm is an “engaged” firm. This means that a small monthly “engagement” fee or retainer is paid and then a reduced fee for each placement. The advantage of this type of agreement is for budget purposes and the fact that you are “top of mind” for the engaged firm if they want to ensure a continuation of the engagement. In addition, executive search firms offer replacement guarantees, something which is not possible with in-house staff. While a typical in-house recruiter has access to one or two job boards and must depend on responses to ads, a good Executive Search firm may have access to 5 or more boards and in our case have direct recruiting and referral sources far deeper than the average in-house recruiter can possibly have. In addition, the firm must hustle to source, recruit and present the top candidates for a given search. And in south Florida, given restrictions and license issues, an outside firm manages the process effectively to ensure results. So when faced with business uncertainty, and economic pressures, using outsourced “just in time” Executive Search firms makes sense.
Mark Shachner, M.D.
Its hard to imagine a volunteer opportunity more rewarding than one that brings smiles to children who are seriously ill.
Denise Israel (left) and Samson visiting patients at Miami Childrens Hospital.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) has captured the attention of practitioners, insurers and policy makers for years. With the enactment of The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 which provides billions of stimulus dollars along with Medicare bonuses over the next 5 years, for those physicians that implement EMR systems, the interest has escalated.
- The Anti-kickback Statute.
- The Stark anti-referral rules.
- Concerns about enhanced malpractice exposure.
- HIPAAs privacy and security regulations.
- In some contexts, the anti-trust laws.
The above legal issues may or may not be barriers depending upon the circumstances of any implementation of an EMR. Regulation of medical records is still based upon rules created in the era of paper records. There have been recent changes to the Department of Health rules governing hospital records written in the 1970s which neither permitted electronic records nor prohibit them. Therefore, none of these rules address the issues of the electronic era such as what is the “original record” or how does one authenticate entries.
The Anti-kickback Statute, and its relevant safe-harbors, is a barrier to implementing EMRs because it prohibits remuneration in exchange for referrals in most cases. Such as when a hospital wants to make its EMR available to its medical staff and offers equipment and software that will incline physicians to refer to the hospital in exchange for the EMR. Many EMRs will facilitate referrals between hospitals and referring physicians that could implicate the Stark rules on compensation relationships. However, the Stark rules offer interesting exceptions, if a hospital provides to its medical staff hardware to support access to the hospitals EMR, and it was wholly dedicated to the use, there would not be a Stark problem. The Stark rules also provide for an exception for community wide health information systems. This Stark exception protects “remuneration” in the form of hardware and software used in these information sharing systems. HIPAAs privacy and security standards present one of the more formidable barriers to the deployment of EMR systems as envisioned by the federal government; that is, regional networks of record sharing organizations through which completely unrelated physicians can locate, request and obtain the medical records of patients. The clear bias of Privacy Rules favors disclosure and downstream use of medical information along familiar lines of medical practice and health care delivery. Sharing EMR data between a medical staff and a hospital is workable under the Privacy Rule. However, nothing in the Privacy Rules anticipates the kind of wide open, unrestricted sharing of information among completely unrelated health care providers that the federal vision embraces. The technical challenges of authentication of parties to requested sharing are substantial and maintaining the integrity of vital content cannot be over-emphasized. One final legal barrier to shared EMR systems is seen by some in the anti-trust laws, which prohibit anti-competitive behavior, including price fixing. In the case of EMR, the anti-trust issue involves largely the content of EMR systems and what is being shared. Many proponents of EMRs expect them to include clinical information as well as related payment information. Sharing payment information could enable competing providers to collude on prices and therefore violate the anti-trust laws. Further concerns arise relating to exclusionary agreements among providers. Some anti-trust analysts believe that among competing providers, EMRs will be used to include only those who would seek to dominate a market while also excluding those who are seen as competitors. When an EMR implementation moves out of the stand-alone model and into sharing EMR data between clinically integrated practitioners, more legal barriers arise. Here the Anti-kickback and Stark prohibitions become of paramount concern because of the underlying referral relationships. However, these concerns may improve with the development of more realistic safe harbors and exceptions to Stark. Privacy and security issues are far from negligible, but they are manageable in this still relatively closed information sharing system. The federally envisioned world of region-wide sharing of EMR systems presents most of the above issues and challenges given the complexity of this as yet-to-be-fully-defined undertaking.Each year, the month of November is designated “National Family Caregivers Month” as a time to thank, support, educate, and empower family caregivers.
Caregivers are anyone who provides unpaid assistance to a chronically ill, disabled or elderly family member, friend or neighbor. Caregivers are often the primary source of care and are viewed as an unpaid extension of the U.S. healthcare system. Caring for someone who is progressively ill can be an enriching and fulfilling life event for the caregiver. However, it is well-documented that the process can also be physically and emotionally stressful. Caregiving can take a toll on relationships, work performance, health and well-being.
Caregiver Comfort Circles meet twice a month and are co-facilitated by Janet Siniscalchi, R.N., and Stefanie McKee, Ph.D (upper right.)
Complementary Therapy practitioner, Janet Siniscalchi, R.N., provides a Reiki session for a caregiver.
- The Sylvia Wolens Caregiver Education Program provides skills training workshops on basic tasks and techniques associated with caregiving; offers a step-by-step skills training DVD, “A Lifeline for Caregivers”; provides information on community resources; and offers lectures on self-care topics.
- Complementary Therapies are offered to reduce stress, restore energy, and nurture the mind, body and spirit of caregivers. Complementary therapies offered include: Reiki, Healing Touch, Guided Imagery, Meditation, Yoga and Drum Circle.
- Caregiver Support Groups allow caregivers to come together to share experiences, gain new knowledge and establish supportive relationships with other caregivers. Caregivers learn self-care strategies and the importance of taking time to care for themselves.
- Caregiver Respite is available to give caregivers a needed break from their caregiving role. Caregivers can use this time to focus on themselves. For example, to attend Aloesea Program activities, have lunch with friends, attend their own doctors appointments, or go grocery shopping. The Program has trained volunteers available to provide respite care.
The Aloesea Caregiver Program recognizes the importance of supporting, educating and empowering caregivers during National Family Caregivers Month and throughout the year.